fbt/sbase
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
9a2b8d3531
sbase/libutil/recurse.c

108 lines
2.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
#include <dirent.h>
Audit du(1) and refactor recurse() While auditing du(1) I realized that there's no way the over 100 lines of procedures in du() would pass the audit. Instead, I decided to rewrite this section using recurse() from libutil. However, the issue was that you'd need some kind of payload to count the number of bytes in the subdirectories and use them in the higher hierarchies. The solution is to add a "void *data" data pointer to each recurse- function-prototype, which we might also be able to use in other recurse-applications. recurse() itself had to be augmented with a recurse_samedev-flag, which basically prevents recurse from leaving the current device. Now, let's take a closer look at the audit: 1) Removing the now unnecessary util-functions push, pop, xrealpath, rename print() to printpath(), localize some global variables. 2) Only pass the block count to nblks instead of the entire stat- pointer. 3) Fix estrtonum to use the minimum of LLONG_MAX and SIZE_MAX. 4) Use idiomatic argv+argc-loop 5) Report proper exit-status.
2015-03-11 22:21:52 +00:00
#include <errno.h>
Add strlcpy()/strlcat() Refactor recurse() routine in preparation to moving tar(1) over to use it instead of the ftw() interface.
2014-01-30 12:37:35 +00:00
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdio.h>
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
recurse: ignore links
2011-06-04 13:30:54 +00:00
#include <sys/stat.h>
Add strlcpy()/strlcat() Refactor recurse() routine in preparation to moving tar(1) over to use it instead of the ftw() interface.
2014-01-30 12:37:35 +00:00
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
Style inquistion for util and some tools.
2013-03-05 20:46:48 +00:00
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
#include "../fs.h"
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
#include "../util.h"
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
int recurse_status = 0;
Refactor enmasse() and recurse() to reflect depth The HLP-changes to sbase have been a great addition of functionality, but they kind of "polluted" the enmasse() and recurse() prototypes. As this will come in handy in the future, knowing at which "depth" you are inside a recursing function is an important functionality. Instead of having a special HLP-flag passed to enmasse, each sub- function needs to provide it on its own and can calculate results based on the current depth (for instance, 'H' implies 'P' at depth > 0). A special case is recurse(), because it actually depends on the follow-type. A new flag "recurse_follow" brings consistency into what used to be spread across different naming conventions (fflag, HLP_flag, ...). This also fixes numerous bugs with the behaviour of HLP in the tools using it.
2015-03-02 20:43:56 +00:00
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
void
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
recurse(const char *path, void *data, struct recursor *r)
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
{
struct dirent *d;
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
struct history *new, *h;
struct stat st, dst;
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
DIR *dp;
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
int (*statf)(const char *, struct stat *);
char subpath[PATH_MAX], *statf_name;
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
if (r->follow == 'P' || (r->follow == 'H' && r->depth)) {
statf_name = "lstat";
statf = lstat;
} else {
statf_name = "stat";
statf = stat;
Audit du(1) and refactor recurse() While auditing du(1) I realized that there's no way the over 100 lines of procedures in du() would pass the audit. Instead, I decided to rewrite this section using recurse() from libutil. However, the issue was that you'd need some kind of payload to count the number of bytes in the subdirectories and use them in the higher hierarchies. The solution is to add a "void *data" data pointer to each recurse- function-prototype, which we might also be able to use in other recurse-applications. recurse() itself had to be augmented with a recurse_samedev-flag, which basically prevents recurse from leaving the current device. Now, let's take a closer look at the audit: 1) Removing the now unnecessary util-functions push, pop, xrealpath, rename print() to printpath(), localize some global variables. 2) Only pass the block count to nblks instead of the entire stat- pointer. 3) Fix estrtonum to use the minimum of LLONG_MAX and SIZE_MAX. 4) Use idiomatic argv+argc-loop 5) Report proper exit-status.
2015-03-11 22:21:52 +00:00
}
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
if (statf(path, &st) < 0) {
Add SILENT flag to recurse() recurse() is getting smarter every day. I expect it to pass the Turing test in a few months. Along the way, it was reported that "rm -f" on nonexistant files reports their missing as an internal recurse()-error. So recurse() knows when to shut up, I added the SILENT flag to fix all these things.
2015-04-19 12:00:47 +00:00
if (!(r->flags & SILENT)) {
weprintf("%s %s:", statf_name, path);
recurse_status = 1;
}
Audit du(1) and refactor recurse() While auditing du(1) I realized that there's no way the over 100 lines of procedures in du() would pass the audit. Instead, I decided to rewrite this section using recurse() from libutil. However, the issue was that you'd need some kind of payload to count the number of bytes in the subdirectories and use them in the higher hierarchies. The solution is to add a "void *data" data pointer to each recurse- function-prototype, which we might also be able to use in other recurse-applications. recurse() itself had to be augmented with a recurse_samedev-flag, which basically prevents recurse from leaving the current device. Now, let's take a closer look at the audit: 1) Removing the now unnecessary util-functions push, pop, xrealpath, rename print() to printpath(), localize some global variables. 2) Only pass the block count to nblks instead of the entire stat- pointer. 3) Fix estrtonum to use the minimum of LLONG_MAX and SIZE_MAX. 4) Use idiomatic argv+argc-loop 5) Report proper exit-status.
2015-03-11 22:21:52 +00:00
return;
}
Add maxdepth to recurse() This also makes more sense.
2015-04-18 20:04:49 +00:00
if (!S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
Refactor recurse() again Okay, why yet another recurse()-refactor? The last one added the recursor-struct, which simplified things on the user-end, but there was still one thing that bugged me a lot: Previously, all fn()'s were forced to (l)stat the paths themselves. This does not work well when you try to keep up with H-, L- and P- flags at the same time, as each utility-function would have to set the right function-pointer for (l)stat every single time. This is not desirable. Furthermore, recurse should be easy to use and not involve trouble finding the right (l)stat-function to do it right. So, what we needed was a stat-argument for each fn(), so it is directly accessible. This was impossible to do though when the fn()'s are still directly called by the programs to "start" the recurse. Thus, the fundamental change is to make recurse() the function to go, while designing the fn()'s in a way they can "live" with st being NULL (we don't want a null-pointer-deref). What you can see in this commit is the result of this work. Why all this trouble instead of using nftw? The special thing about recurse() is that you tell the function when to recurse() in your fn(). You don't need special flags to tell nftw() to skip the subtree, just to give an example. The only single downside to this is that now, you are not allowed to unconditionally call recurse() from your fn(). It has to be a directory. However, that is a cost I think is easily weighed up by the advantages. Another thing is the history: I added a procedure at the end of the outmost recurse to free the history. This way we don't leak memory. A simple optimization on the side: - if (h->dev == st.st_dev && h->ino == st.st_ino) + if (h->ino == st.st_ino && h->dev == st.st_dev) First compare the likely difference in inode-numbers instead of checking the unlikely condition that the device-numbers are different.
2015-03-18 23:53:42 +00:00
(r->fn)(path, &st, data, r);
recurse: ignore links
2011-06-04 13:30:54 +00:00
return;
Refactor recurse() again Okay, why yet another recurse()-refactor? The last one added the recursor-struct, which simplified things on the user-end, but there was still one thing that bugged me a lot: Previously, all fn()'s were forced to (l)stat the paths themselves. This does not work well when you try to keep up with H-, L- and P- flags at the same time, as each utility-function would have to set the right function-pointer for (l)stat every single time. This is not desirable. Furthermore, recurse should be easy to use and not involve trouble finding the right (l)stat-function to do it right. So, what we needed was a stat-argument for each fn(), so it is directly accessible. This was impossible to do though when the fn()'s are still directly called by the programs to "start" the recurse. Thus, the fundamental change is to make recurse() the function to go, while designing the fn()'s in a way they can "live" with st being NULL (we don't want a null-pointer-deref). What you can see in this commit is the result of this work. Why all this trouble instead of using nftw? The special thing about recurse() is that you tell the function when to recurse() in your fn(). You don't need special flags to tell nftw() to skip the subtree, just to give an example. The only single downside to this is that now, you are not allowed to unconditionally call recurse() from your fn(). It has to be a directory. However, that is a cost I think is easily weighed up by the advantages. Another thing is the history: I added a procedure at the end of the outmost recurse to free the history. This way we don't leak memory. A simple optimization on the side: - if (h->dev == st.st_dev && h->ino == st.st_ino) + if (h->ino == st.st_ino && h->dev == st.st_dev) First compare the likely difference in inode-numbers instead of checking the unlikely condition that the device-numbers are different.
2015-03-18 23:53:42 +00:00
}
Add some error checking to util/recurse.c Some more stylistic changes and simplification.
2014-06-30 14:58:00 +00:00
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
new = emalloc(sizeof(struct history));
new->prev = r->hist;
r->hist = new;
new->dev = st.st_dev;
new->ino = st.st_ino;
for (h = new->prev; h; h = h->prev)
Refactor recurse() again Okay, why yet another recurse()-refactor? The last one added the recursor-struct, which simplified things on the user-end, but there was still one thing that bugged me a lot: Previously, all fn()'s were forced to (l)stat the paths themselves. This does not work well when you try to keep up with H-, L- and P- flags at the same time, as each utility-function would have to set the right function-pointer for (l)stat every single time. This is not desirable. Furthermore, recurse should be easy to use and not involve trouble finding the right (l)stat-function to do it right. So, what we needed was a stat-argument for each fn(), so it is directly accessible. This was impossible to do though when the fn()'s are still directly called by the programs to "start" the recurse. Thus, the fundamental change is to make recurse() the function to go, while designing the fn()'s in a way they can "live" with st being NULL (we don't want a null-pointer-deref). What you can see in this commit is the result of this work. Why all this trouble instead of using nftw? The special thing about recurse() is that you tell the function when to recurse() in your fn(). You don't need special flags to tell nftw() to skip the subtree, just to give an example. The only single downside to this is that now, you are not allowed to unconditionally call recurse() from your fn(). It has to be a directory. However, that is a cost I think is easily weighed up by the advantages. Another thing is the history: I added a procedure at the end of the outmost recurse to free the history. This way we don't leak memory. A simple optimization on the side: - if (h->dev == st.st_dev && h->ino == st.st_ino) + if (h->ino == st.st_ino && h->dev == st.st_dev) First compare the likely difference in inode-numbers instead of checking the unlikely condition that the device-numbers are different.
2015-03-18 23:53:42 +00:00
if (h->ino == st.st_ino && h->dev == st.st_dev)
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
return;
if (!(dp = opendir(path))) {
Add SILENT flag to recurse() recurse() is getting smarter every day. I expect it to pass the Turing test in a few months. Along the way, it was reported that "rm -f" on nonexistant files reports their missing as an internal recurse()-error. So recurse() knows when to shut up, I added the SILENT flag to fix all these things.
2015-04-19 12:00:47 +00:00
if (!(r->flags & SILENT)) {
weprintf("opendir %s:", path);
recurse_status = 1;
}
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
return;
}
recurse: ignore links
2011-06-04 13:30:54 +00:00
Audit tar(1), add DIRFIRST-flag to recurse() I've been wanting to do this for a while now, as tar(1) used to be one of messiest and cruftiest tools. First off, before walking through the audit, I'll talk about what the DIRFIRST-flag for recurse() does. It basically calls fn() on the first-level-dir before calling it's subentries. It's necessary here, because else the order of the tar-files would've been wrong (it would try to create dir/file before creating dir/). Now, to the audit: 1) Update manpage, fix mistake that compression is also available for compressing. It's only available for extracting. 2) Define the major, minor and makedev macros from glibc by ourselves. No need to rely on them, as they are common sense. decomp() 3) Simple refactorization. putoctal() 4) Add a truncation check for snprintf(). archive() 5) BUGFIX: Add checks to any checkable function, don't blindly call them, this is harmful and there are 100 ways to exploit that. 6) Use estrlcpy() instead of snprintf() wherever possible, fix alignment. 7) BUGFIX: Terminate the result-buffer of readlink(), check if it even succeeded. 8) Fix sizeof()-formatting. unarchive() 9) BUGFIX: Add checks to any checkable function, don't blindly call them, this is harmful and there are 100 ways to exploit that. 10) BUGFIX: strtoul can happily return negative numbers. Add checks for that and also if the full string has been processed. 11) Remove calls to perror(). We have eprintf, use it. 12) BUGFIX: "minor = strtoul(h->mode, 0, 8);". We need h->minor of course. 13) Fix typo "usupported", remove fprintf-call. print() 14) Check fread(). xt() 15) Get rid of snprintf-magic. Use estrlcat(). 16) BUGFIX: check for ferror() on the tarfile. usage() 17) Update it. The old usage() was like 1000 years old. main() 18) Add DIRFIRST-flag to the recursor. 19) Don't print usage() when a mode is re-set. We allow this in general. 20) Add function checks and fix error messages. 21) Add tarfilename-global for proper error-messages.
2015-03-21 00:03:35 +00:00
if (!r->depth && (r->flags & DIRFIRST))
(r->fn)(path, &st, data, r);
Add maxdepth to recurse() This also makes more sense.
2015-04-18 20:04:49 +00:00
if (!r->maxdepth || r->depth + 1 < r->maxdepth) {
while ((d = readdir(dp))) {
if (r->follow == 'H') {
statf_name = "lstat";
statf = lstat;
}
if (!strcmp(d->d_name, ".") || !strcmp(d->d_name, ".."))
continue;
estrlcpy(subpath, path, sizeof(subpath));
if (path[strlen(path) - 1] != '/')
estrlcat(subpath, "/", sizeof(subpath));
estrlcat(subpath, d->d_name, sizeof(subpath));
if (statf(subpath, &dst) < 0) {
Add SILENT flag to recurse() recurse() is getting smarter every day. I expect it to pass the Turing test in a few months. Along the way, it was reported that "rm -f" on nonexistant files reports their missing as an internal recurse()-error. So recurse() knows when to shut up, I added the SILENT flag to fix all these things.
2015-04-19 12:00:47 +00:00
if (!(r->flags & SILENT)) {
weprintf("%s %s:", statf_name, subpath);
recurse_status = 1;
}
Add maxdepth to recurse() This also makes more sense.
2015-04-18 20:04:49 +00:00
} else if ((r->flags & SAMEDEV) && dst.st_dev != st.st_dev) {
continue;
} else {
r->depth++;
(r->fn)(subpath, &dst, data, r);
r->depth--;
}
Add history and config-struct to recurse For loop detection, a history is mandatory. In the process of also adding a flexible struct to recurse, the recurse-definition was moved to fs.h. The motivation behind the struct is to allow easy extensions to the recurse-function without having to change the prototypes of all functions in the process. Adding flags is really simple as well now. Using the recursor-struct, it's also easier to see which defaults apply to a program (for instance, which type of follow, ...). Another change was to add proper stat-lstat-usage in recurse. It was wrong before.
2015-03-12 23:25:32 +00:00
}
Style inquistion for util and some tools.
2013-03-05 20:46:48 +00:00
}
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
Refactor recurse() again Okay, why yet another recurse()-refactor? The last one added the recursor-struct, which simplified things on the user-end, but there was still one thing that bugged me a lot: Previously, all fn()'s were forced to (l)stat the paths themselves. This does not work well when you try to keep up with H-, L- and P- flags at the same time, as each utility-function would have to set the right function-pointer for (l)stat every single time. This is not desirable. Furthermore, recurse should be easy to use and not involve trouble finding the right (l)stat-function to do it right. So, what we needed was a stat-argument for each fn(), so it is directly accessible. This was impossible to do though when the fn()'s are still directly called by the programs to "start" the recurse. Thus, the fundamental change is to make recurse() the function to go, while designing the fn()'s in a way they can "live" with st being NULL (we don't want a null-pointer-deref). What you can see in this commit is the result of this work. Why all this trouble instead of using nftw? The special thing about recurse() is that you tell the function when to recurse() in your fn(). You don't need special flags to tell nftw() to skip the subtree, just to give an example. The only single downside to this is that now, you are not allowed to unconditionally call recurse() from your fn(). It has to be a directory. However, that is a cost I think is easily weighed up by the advantages. Another thing is the history: I added a procedure at the end of the outmost recurse to free the history. This way we don't leak memory. A simple optimization on the side: - if (h->dev == st.st_dev && h->ino == st.st_ino) + if (h->ino == st.st_ino && h->dev == st.st_dev) First compare the likely difference in inode-numbers instead of checking the unlikely condition that the device-numbers are different.
2015-03-18 23:53:42 +00:00
if (!r->depth) {
Audit tar(1), add DIRFIRST-flag to recurse() I've been wanting to do this for a while now, as tar(1) used to be one of messiest and cruftiest tools. First off, before walking through the audit, I'll talk about what the DIRFIRST-flag for recurse() does. It basically calls fn() on the first-level-dir before calling it's subentries. It's necessary here, because else the order of the tar-files would've been wrong (it would try to create dir/file before creating dir/). Now, to the audit: 1) Update manpage, fix mistake that compression is also available for compressing. It's only available for extracting. 2) Define the major, minor and makedev macros from glibc by ourselves. No need to rely on them, as they are common sense. decomp() 3) Simple refactorization. putoctal() 4) Add a truncation check for snprintf(). archive() 5) BUGFIX: Add checks to any checkable function, don't blindly call them, this is harmful and there are 100 ways to exploit that. 6) Use estrlcpy() instead of snprintf() wherever possible, fix alignment. 7) BUGFIX: Terminate the result-buffer of readlink(), check if it even succeeded. 8) Fix sizeof()-formatting. unarchive() 9) BUGFIX: Add checks to any checkable function, don't blindly call them, this is harmful and there are 100 ways to exploit that. 10) BUGFIX: strtoul can happily return negative numbers. Add checks for that and also if the full string has been processed. 11) Remove calls to perror(). We have eprintf, use it. 12) BUGFIX: "minor = strtoul(h->mode, 0, 8);". We need h->minor of course. 13) Fix typo "usupported", remove fprintf-call. print() 14) Check fread(). xt() 15) Get rid of snprintf-magic. Use estrlcat(). 16) BUGFIX: check for ferror() on the tarfile. usage() 17) Update it. The old usage() was like 1000 years old. main() 18) Add DIRFIRST-flag to the recursor. 19) Don't print usage() when a mode is re-set. We allow this in general. 20) Add function checks and fix error messages. 21) Add tarfilename-global for proper error-messages.
2015-03-21 00:03:35 +00:00
if (!(r->flags & DIRFIRST))
(r->fn)(path, &st, data, r);
Refactor recurse() again Okay, why yet another recurse()-refactor? The last one added the recursor-struct, which simplified things on the user-end, but there was still one thing that bugged me a lot: Previously, all fn()'s were forced to (l)stat the paths themselves. This does not work well when you try to keep up with H-, L- and P- flags at the same time, as each utility-function would have to set the right function-pointer for (l)stat every single time. This is not desirable. Furthermore, recurse should be easy to use and not involve trouble finding the right (l)stat-function to do it right. So, what we needed was a stat-argument for each fn(), so it is directly accessible. This was impossible to do though when the fn()'s are still directly called by the programs to "start" the recurse. Thus, the fundamental change is to make recurse() the function to go, while designing the fn()'s in a way they can "live" with st being NULL (we don't want a null-pointer-deref). What you can see in this commit is the result of this work. Why all this trouble instead of using nftw? The special thing about recurse() is that you tell the function when to recurse() in your fn(). You don't need special flags to tell nftw() to skip the subtree, just to give an example. The only single downside to this is that now, you are not allowed to unconditionally call recurse() from your fn(). It has to be a directory. However, that is a cost I think is easily weighed up by the advantages. Another thing is the history: I added a procedure at the end of the outmost recurse to free the history. This way we don't leak memory. A simple optimization on the side: - if (h->dev == st.st_dev && h->ino == st.st_ino) + if (h->ino == st.st_ino && h->dev == st.st_dev) First compare the likely difference in inode-numbers instead of checking the unlikely condition that the device-numbers are different.
2015-03-18 23:53:42 +00:00
for (; r->hist; ) {
h = r->hist;
r->hist = r->hist->prev;
free(h);
}
}
add chown
2011-05-24 23:24:33 +00:00
closedir(dp);
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink