fbt/sbase
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
bbd2b4d243
sbase/tr.c

276 lines
5.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Add license remark to tr.c
2015-01-20 15:26:08 +00:00
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
#include <stdlib.h>
Fix coding style It was about damn time. Consistency is very important in such a big codebase.
2014-11-13 17:29:30 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
#include "utf.h"
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
#include "util.h"
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
static int cflag = 0;
static int dflag = 0;
static int sflag = 0;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
struct range {
Rune start;
Rune end;
size_t quant;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
};
Staticise some symbols in tr(1)
2015-01-10 14:21:09 +00:00
static struct {
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
char *name;
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
int (*check)(Rune);
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
} classes[] = {
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
{ "alnum", isalnumrune },
{ "alpha", isalpharune },
{ "blank", isblankrune },
{ "cntrl", iscntrlrune },
{ "digit", isdigitrune },
{ "graph", isgraphrune },
{ "lower", islowerrune },
{ "print", isprintrune },
{ "punct", ispunctrune },
{ "space", isspacerune },
{ "upper", isupperrune },
{ "xdigit", isxdigitrune },
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
};
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
static struct range *set1 = NULL;
static size_t set1ranges = 0;
static int (*set1check)(Rune) = NULL;
static struct range *set2 = NULL;
static size_t set2ranges = 0;
static int (*set2check)(Rune) = NULL;
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
static size_t
rangelen(struct range r)
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
{
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
return (r.end - r.start + 1) * r.quant;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
}
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
static size_t
setlen(struct range *set, size_t setranges)
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
{
tr: fix signed/unsigned warnings
2015-01-10 16:38:28 +00:00
size_t len = 0, i;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < setranges; i++)
len += rangelen(set[i]);
Wrap mbtowc to check for errors
2014-04-12 18:50:51 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
return len;
Wrap mbtowc to check for errors
2014-04-12 18:50:51 +00:00
}
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
static int
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
rstrmatch(Rune *r, char *s, size_t n)
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
{
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
size_t i;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
if (r[i] != s[i])
return 0;
return 1;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
}
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
static size_t
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
makeset(char *str, struct range **set, int (**check)(Rune))
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
{
Implement mallocarray() A function used only in the OpenBSD-Kernel as of now, but it surely provides a helpful interface when you just don't want to make sure the incoming pointer to erealloc() is really NULL so it behaves like malloc, making it a bit more safer. Talking about *allocarray(): It's definitely a major step in code- hardening. Especially as a system administrator, you should be able to trust your core tools without having to worry about segfaults like this, which can easily lead to privilege escalation. How do the GNU coreutils handle this? $ strings -n 4611686018427387903 strings: invalid minimum string length -1 $ strings -n 4611686018427387904 strings: invalid minimum string length 0 They silently overflow... In comparison, sbase: $ strings -n 4611686018427387903 mallocarray: out of memory $ strings -n 4611686018427387904 mallocarray: out of memory The first out of memory is actually a true OOM returned by malloc, whereas the second one is a detected overflow, which is not marked in a special way. Now tell me which diagnostic error-messages are easier to understand.
2015-03-10 21:19:19 +00:00
Rune *rstr;
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
size_t len, i, j, m, n;
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
size_t q, setranges = 0;
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
int factor, base;
/* rstr defines at most len ranges */
Add unescape() to libutil formerly known as resolveescapes(), it is of central use to numerous programs. This drops a lot of LOC.
2015-01-29 20:52:44 +00:00
unescape(str);
Remove mallocarray(...) and use reallocarray(NULL, ...) After a short correspondence with Otto Moerbeek it turned out mallocarray() is only in the OpenBSD-Kernel, because the kernel- malloc doesn't have realloc. Userspace applications should rather use reallocarray with an explicit NULL-pointer. Assuming reallocarray() will become available in c-stdlibs in the next few years, we nip mallocarray() in the bud to allow an easy transition to a system-provided version when the day comes.
2015-03-11 09:50:18 +00:00
rstr = ereallocarray(NULL, utflen(str) + 1, sizeof(*rstr));
Scrap chartorunearr(), introducing utftorunestr() Interface and function as proposed by cls. The reasoning behind this function is that cls expressed his interest to keep memory allocation out of libutf, which is a very good motive. This simplifies the function a lot and should also increase the speed a bit, but the most important factor here is that there's no malloc anywhere in libutf, making it a lot smaller and more robust with a smaller attack-surface. Look at the paste(1) and tr(1) changes for an idiomatic way to allocate the right amount of space for the Rune-array.
2015-02-11 20:32:09 +00:00
len = utftorunestr(str, rstr);
Remove mallocarray(...) and use reallocarray(NULL, ...) After a short correspondence with Otto Moerbeek it turned out mallocarray() is only in the OpenBSD-Kernel, because the kernel- malloc doesn't have realloc. Userspace applications should rather use reallocarray with an explicit NULL-pointer. Assuming reallocarray() will become available in c-stdlibs in the next few years, we nip mallocarray() in the bud to allow an easy transition to a system-provided version when the day comes.
2015-03-11 09:50:18 +00:00
*set = ereallocarray(NULL, len, sizeof(**set));
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (rstr[i] == '[') {
j = i;
nextbrack:
if (j == len)
goto literal;
for (m = j; m < len; m++)
if (rstr[m] == ']') {
j = m;
break;
}
if (j == i)
goto literal;
/* CLASSES [=EQUIV=] (skip) */
if (j - i > 3 && rstr[i + 1] == '=' && rstr[m - 1] == '=') {
Add trivial equivalence class support in tr(1) and update manpage Equivalence classes are a hard matter and there's still no "standard" way to solve the issue. Previously, tr would just skip those classes, but it's much better when it resolves a [=c=] to a normal c instead of treating it as a literal. Also, reflect recent changes in the manpage (octal escapes) and fix the markup in some areas.
2015-01-28 18:44:05 +00:00
if (j - i != 4)
goto literal;
(*set)[setranges].start = rstr[i + 2];
(*set)[setranges].end = rstr[i + 2];
(*set)[setranges].quant = 1;
setranges++;
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
i = j;
continue;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
}
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
/* CLASSES [:CLASS:] */
if (j - i > 3 && rstr[i + 1] == ':' && rstr[m - 1] == ':') {
for (n = 0; n < LEN(classes); n++) {
if (rstrmatch(rstr + i + 2, classes[n].name, j - i - 3)) {
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
*check = classes[n].check;
return 0;
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
}
}
Fix mapping a class to a simple set and improve error-reporting It's standard behaviour to map a whole class of matched objects to the last element of a given simple set2 instead of just passing it through. Also, error out more strictly when the user gives us bogus sets.
2015-01-11 23:03:48 +00:00
eprintf("Invalid character class.\n");
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
}
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
/* REPEAT [_*n] (only allowed in set2) */
if (j - i > 2 && rstr[i + 2] == '*' && set1ranges > 0) {
/* check if right side of '*' is a number */
q = 0;
factor = 1;
base = (rstr[i + 3] == '0') ? 8 : 10;
for (n = j - 1; n > i + 2; n--) {
if (rstr[n] < '0' && rstr[n] > '9') {
n = 0;
break;
}
q += (rstr[n] - '0') * factor;
factor *= base;
}
if (n == 0) {
j = m + 1;
goto nextbrack;
}
(*set)[setranges].start = rstr[i + 1];
(*set)[setranges].end = rstr[i + 1];
(*set)[setranges].quant = q ? q : setlen(set1, set1ranges);
setranges++;
i = j;
continue;
}
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
j = m + 1;
goto nextbrack;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
}
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
literal:
/* RANGES [_-__-_], _-__-_ */
/* LITERALS _______ */
(*set)[setranges].start = rstr[i];
if (i < len - 2 && rstr[i + 1] == '-' && rstr[i + 2] >= rstr[i])
i += 2;
(*set)[setranges].end = rstr[i];
(*set)[setranges].quant = 1;
setranges++;
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
}
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
free(rstr);
return setranges;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
}
static void
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
usage(void)
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
{
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
eprintf("usage: %s [-cCds] set1 [set2]\n", argv0);
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
}
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
Rune r = 0, lastrune = 0;
Prevail order
2015-01-10 19:55:37 +00:00
size_t off1, off2, i, m;
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
ARGBEGIN {
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
case 'c':
case 'C':
cflag = 1;
break;
tr: add dflag, error with usage() on invalid flag combination Signed-off-by: Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo@codemadness.org>
2014-04-09 12:12:34 +00:00
case 'd':
dflag = 1;
break;
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
case 's':
sflag = 1;
Improved tr - Added support for character ranges ( a-z ) - Added support for complementary charset ( -c ), only in delete mode - Added support for octal escape sequences - Unicode now only works when there are no octal escape sequences, otherwise behavior is not predictable at first sight. - tr now supports null characters in the input - Does not yet have support for character classes ( [:upper:] )
2014-07-14 22:49:42 +00:00
break;
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
default:
usage();
} ARGEND;
Audit tr(1) A tool of my own devising, except from a small style-fix this code has already been triple-checked.
2015-03-17 22:41:22 +00:00
if (!argc || argc > 2 || (argc == 1 && dflag == sflag))
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
usage();
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
set1ranges = makeset(argv[0], &set1, &set1check);
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
if (argc == 2)
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
set2ranges = makeset(argv[1], &set2, &set2check);
if (dflag == sflag && !set2ranges && !set2check)
Fix mapping a class to a simple set and improve error-reporting It's standard behaviour to map a whole class of matched objects to the last element of a given simple set2 instead of just passing it through. Also, error out more strictly when the user gives us bogus sets.
2015-01-11 23:03:48 +00:00
eprintf("set2 must be non-empty.\n");
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
if (set2check && set2check != islowerrune && set2check != isupperrune)
Fix mapping a class to a simple set and improve error-reporting It's standard behaviour to map a whole class of matched objects to the last element of a given simple set2 instead of just passing it through. Also, error out more strictly when the user gives us bogus sets.
2015-01-11 23:03:48 +00:00
eprintf("set2 can only be the 'lower' or 'upper' class.\n");
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
if (set2check && cflag && !dflag)
tr : Revert 97c59861465172f24ced6fe30d5de69403b9b193 This was no typo.
2015-02-07 17:09:04 +00:00
eprintf("set2 can't be imaged to from a complement.\n");
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
read:
Scrap readrune(), introducing fgetrune() Interface as proposed by cls, but internally rewritten after a few considerations. The code is much shorter and to the point, aligning itself with other standard functions. It should also be much faster, which is not bad.
2015-02-11 19:13:43 +00:00
if (!efgetrune(&r, stdin, "<stdin>"))
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
return 0;
off1 = off2 = 0;
for (i = 0; i < set1ranges; i++) {
if (set1[i].start <= r && r <= set1[i].end) {
Fix segmentation fault in tr(1) with -dc and one set
2015-02-02 16:57:46 +00:00
if (dflag) {
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
if (!cflag || (sflag && r == lastrune))
Fix segmentation fault in tr(1) with -dc and one set
2015-02-02 16:57:46 +00:00
goto read;
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
else
goto write;
Fix segmentation fault in tr(1) with -dc and one set
2015-02-02 16:57:46 +00:00
}
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
if (sflag) {
if (r == lastrune)
goto read;
else
goto write;
}
for (m = 0; m < i; m++)
off1 += rangelen(set1[m]);
off1 += r - set1[m].start;
if (off1 > setlen(set2, set2ranges) - 1) {
r = set2[set2ranges - 1].end;
goto write;
}
for (m = 0; m < set2ranges; m++) {
if (off2 + rangelen(set2[m]) > off1) {
m++;
break;
}
off2 += rangelen(set2[m]);
}
m--;
r = set2[m].start + (off1 - off2) / set2[m].quant;
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
goto write;
}
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
}
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
if (set1check && set1check(r)) {
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
if (dflag) {
if (!cflag || (sflag && r == lastrune))
Fix segmentation fault in tr(1) with -dc and one set
2015-02-02 16:57:46 +00:00
goto read;
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
else
goto write;
}
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
if (sflag) {
if (r == lastrune)
goto read;
else
goto write;
}
Use runetypebody.h-functions in tr(1) That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
2015-02-11 12:03:32 +00:00
if (set1check == isupperrune && set2check == islowerrune)
r = tolowerrune(r);
else if (set1check == islowerrune && set2check == isupperrune)
r = toupperrune(r);
Fix mapping a class to a simple set and improve error-reporting It's standard behaviour to map a whole class of matched objects to the last element of a given simple set2 instead of just passing it through. Also, error out more strictly when the user gives us bogus sets.
2015-01-11 23:03:48 +00:00
else if (set2ranges > 0)
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
r = cflag ? r : set2[set2ranges - 1].end;
Fix mapping a class to a simple set and improve error-reporting It's standard behaviour to map a whole class of matched objects to the last element of a given simple set2 instead of just passing it through. Also, error out more strictly when the user gives us bogus sets.
2015-01-11 23:03:48 +00:00
else
eprintf("Misaligned character classes.\n");
Fix tr(1) behaviour in special cases and be stricter about stuff
2015-02-02 18:59:41 +00:00
} else if (cflag && set2ranges > 0) {
r = set2[set2ranges - 1].end;
Add Unicode character class support Thinking about it long enough, the solution seems almost trivial.
2015-01-11 19:26:20 +00:00
}
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
if (dflag && cflag)
goto read;
if (dflag && sflag && r == lastrune)
goto read;
write:
lastrune = r;
Scrap writerune(), introducing fputrune() Interface and function as proposed by cls. Code is also shorter, everything else analogous to fgetrune().
2015-02-11 19:58:00 +00:00
efputrune(&r, stdout, "<stdout>");
Rewrite tr(1) in a sane way tr(1) always used to be a saddening part of sbase, which was inherently broken and crufted. But to be fair, the POSIX-standard doesn't make it very simple. Given the current version was unfixable and broken by design, I sat down and rewrote tr(1) very close to the concept of set theory and the POSIX-standard with a few exceptions: - UTF-8: not allowed in POSIX, but in my opinion a must. This finally allows you to work with UTF-8 streams without problems or unexpected behaviour. - Equivalence classes: Left out, even GNU coreutils ignore them and depending on LC_COLLATE, which sucks. - Character classes: No experiments or environment-variable-trickery. Just plain definitions derived from the POSIX- standard, working as expected. I tested this thoroughly, but expect problems to show up in some way given the wide range of input this program has to handle. The only thing left on the TODO is to add support for literal expressions ('\n', '\t', '\001', ...) and probably rethinking the way [_*n] is unnecessarily restricted to string2.
2015-01-09 19:36:27 +00:00
goto read;
Add the tr program including man page
2013-11-15 16:25:10 +00:00
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink